Chinese words traditionally have been considered uninteresting as objects of morphological investigation because they do not manifest characteristics thought lean to the concept morphology (such as grammatical agreement or morphophonemic and paradigmatic alternation Chinese is particularly suited to answer these questions because Chinese word components are relatively easy to isolate , set ashore up and track over timeChinese words exhibit opposite properties that moldinessiness be understood if we wish to bring a universal characterization of words . For example , to what extent is the concept of bound take root - which is important in Chinese - germane(predicate) in other deliverys ? Since Chinese is the world s most wide spoken language , it is clear that any account of language that aspire s to a claim of universality - including universals of word structure - must take the Chinese data into account . Chinese words have a story to tell about the degree to which words are susceptible to the algorithms of syntax , and whether there is a definition of word that works reasonably well crossways languages . Using Chinese to address these questions is bound to increase our sense of universal word propertiesOne source of these myths is confusion about the Chinese language itself . because , this study begins with a review of the language that gave devise to the writing : its typology , characteristics , and some myths of its own perpetrated by scholars who should have it away break up -- and by others with a political agenda who do know better (Maclay Baldwin 1944 Chinese means many things , and we can...If you want to give birth a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment