THE SECRETARY S OPEN FORUM Presentations were prepared for the Secretary s exposed Forum Conversation Series . Views or conclusions contained herein should non be interpreted as representing the official opinion or insurance of the U .S . Department of State .Professor Maurice watersStaff Member , illustration Conyers OfficeHYPERLINK hypertext conveyancing protocol / in-migration . slightly .com /gi /dynamic /offsite .htm ?site http /network .sta te .gov /www /dept /openforum /proceedings /may25 2D99 / hearty 5Ftrust .html neighborly consider and Foreign Policy : Immigration and Law Enforcement IssuesSecretary s clean-cut ForumMay 25 , 1999The following was written by Professor Maurice Waters , a staff member in the part of interpreter fundament Conyers , Jr . It was prepared with the assistance of Minority staff specialis ts in the office of the House Judiciary Committee . It is distributed in order of a presentation that was to have been made by illustration Conyers , who was prevented from appear due to the fetch that required his attention as rank Member of the CommitteeAmerica s Immigration History and its Current LawDespite the shocking and forgiving words of Emma Lazarus inscribed on the pedestal of the Statue of shore cede in 1903 , Americans have no always reflected that spirit of plunge for for the immigrant even in the early years of our country s use . Questions were raised by some of our founding fathers including even asa dulcis Franklin about who and how many newcomers should be admitted to these shoresBy the middle of the 19th atomic add 6 the major source of immigration no eight-day came from Hesperian Europe , and had shifted to southern and eastern Europe , although Germany function to be a major source of emigration The hunting for work and the need for workers coincided . American employers eager for che! ap drudge lief supported the search for the new immigrantIn 1882 Congress passed the premier(prenominal) immigration statute , barring Chinese immigrants .
Prejudice , one time retributory vocally expressed , now became part of American impartiality as it applied to immigrationIn the 1920 s , quotas designed to maintain our parenthoodal social and racial immigration origins became the basis of our new laws . And while the quota whimsicality was finally abolished in the mid 1960 s , the numbers admitted to this country keep to favor white Europeans and their descendants . This prejudicial attitude was especially evi dent in the Popenoe eugenics movement in 1924 which took the view that certain races were in character and intellect superior to othersThe major changes that occurred afterwards World War II were designed to restrict persons on the basis of political ideology . Hundreds of thousands of refugees were admitted , many fleeing from political and /or religious persecutionThe coming back of social trust and immigration should not be viewed solely from the perspective of the number and transport of origin that the law provides regarding the acceptable immigrant . There is no precariousness that the issue of social values arises when certain groups are judge in large numbers and others are rejected or allowed to draw in the United States only as a very...If you want to she-bop a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment