'Effects of religion on children positive or negative?\r'

'The David Family Case Family Theory: In my culture about the structural model I recalled Munich because like myself his counterbalance concern was difficulty focused deep down the context of the family building (Goldenberg 2000). â€Å"‘ book always felt that if a sister is having constant escalating behaviors of tantrums after the term of four t present has to be a job within the family structure. And so in hearing from healer of who would m whatever terms in the past visit lonesome(prenominal) with boorren and non the kindles of families.This would really sound an depress with me but since I pretermited the correspondence in the mental field I would asked the skepticism of their knowledge in child growing and the family as the root of guiding a childs premier(prenominal) developmental years. I too remember reading about Munchies hunt down and his vast array of experiences for example; Munich his well(p) in pediatrics, his epoch volunteered in the a rray as a Doctor during Israels warfargon in 1948, he was a child psychiatrist in the United States works(a)s with families in poverty and those who had multiple problems, disconnected structures and dis primed(p) children from the Holocaust.His heart to volunteer and research these k nonty issues revealed to me his passion and heart for the family as a unit. In my personal experience as an Early Childhood Specialist working with families with children of trauma I often assemble myself be approached by clinicians who were working with issue children up to now lacked to understand the details of the azoic developmental domains. I wondered if they understood temperament, p atomic number 18nting styles or the developmental milestones like, social/emotional patterns, independence, problem solving or attachment and bonding.Clinicians would conceive toddlers dis channelize overing very angry levels of behavior non recognizing they were frustrated simply because they were delay ed in their speech, disengaged with their parents, or in a reign land that developed mental stresses. So as I reviewed the David case I first observed that the structural of the family dodging; that being, florists chrysanthemum, soda water and children who had been glowering-and-on(a) by epoch the hierarchy currently being the grandparents, and the maternal roles. This was the root in the context of this families effect patterns that extremityed to be changed according to Munchies major thesis of the structural model (peg. 94). This opening looks into the races, the organization of the family structure having to collectable with family roles, rules within this organisation, boundaries and wholeness. It as well emphasizes on the wholeness of the family system, the mildew the family hierarchical organization and the interdependent go of its subsystems for the wellbeing if individually separate that harp of the whole family system. In this theory enmeshment is p arking area and the family system is functioning at a dysfunctional level for the lack of boundaries, for inhibiting individual autonomy, and for disruptions in the maternal subsystem.This theory reminds me of a sports; for example, baseball in expressing my complete concord of this theory I allow for cite it to this sport. In the play of baseball it does consist of organization of for each one individuals place in order to function successfully as a whole team. The pitcher and the ski bindingstop are like the parents in the family. If they lack to understand their roles and that of their team-members thence the whole secret plan will be disorganized and interrupted by a loss and results in very angry, frustrated and confused emotions. What to do? What interventions will the coach consume?In my case what will I implement according to my chosen theory? Alignment, Power, and Coalitions: The David family came to therapy overdue to their enmeshed family. The parents were having problems in their relationships with their seven and eightsome year old children who were throwing full winded tantrums consistently, some examples of this manifestation where the children hitting their heads on the walls or vomiting also not listening to their parents instructions and expressing anger at their parents by physically kicking them during these escalating behaviors.As Munich puts it,” this alternated the patterns in the Davits family structure they went without consideration which caused deviation from any established family rules such as; mandarins, a lack hierarchy, the interdependent functioning, and the wholeness of the family system (Goldenberg 2000). ” The results became the resistance of the children making a sizable family connection with their parents. This is how my back- round training in child development will help me as a future clinician.If the child lacks to build a trusting and get relationships with their parents becoming that secure b ase in order for the child to become a healthy separated individual then a sense of loss and precaution will result therefore displaying itself as in the Davits hillsides case. As a therapist I would first look into the family strengths, in this case the David family taking the step to explore out therapy without it being forced upon them due to an outside report such as D. S. S. I would praise them for taking the first step then observe the spousal, parental and siblings subsystems in this family.In observing this at the first posing I could recognize that as the cause expressed her emotions the children and amaze displayed empathy as they all tried to treasure the mother. The father stepped in and gave instructions to the children who followed wrought it revealed that they did have some understanding for fathers hierarchy in this role. This was a psychosomatic family that was enmeshed yet their quick response to comfort the mother here also revealed that they were not diseng aged. That showed me that they would be willing to negotiate differences.Within this family it was clear that alignments were off and needed to be put back in concert by joining its forces by positive activities that engaged in tint time fatigued. It was the long parental working hours in the Davits family that disrupted the emotional and psychological connections that members should make with one another. This was the former that was displaced here and instead because of the work demand was minded(p) over to the grandparents which caused stressed in the children producing escalating behaviors towards parents.In my understanding the grandparents where the third party alliances between the parent and children which Munich refers to as the coalitions. The grandparents became the dominant part of this family that detoured the power from the parents as the children cried out for their grandparents quite than parents during a place that seemed foreign to them. This resulted in confl icts that placed added stressed on the family systems. Intervention: The David family necessitate to be line uped, new boundaries must(prenominal) be set in place and reframing must be worked into this family system.I will use the vignette as an example therapy session and how I would guide it using Munchies structural therapy. Children are anxious(p) and wondering the office ask to go home shout for their grandparents, they render each other for comfort quite an than parents, parents become embarrassed. Children engage with therapist petition to play with toys, mother becomes emotional children and save respond. I would greet all by name shaking each individuals men and then ask mom and dad what they would eke to play with their children today.Knowing that the children are engaging with me as their therapist and interested in my toys this would be used as my intervention tools in order to have the family enact a typical family conflict. Upon children calling out crying for their grandparents I would first validate their reconcile of disconnectedness from grandparents yet redirect them by saying, ” look today mammary gland and pop music wants your time to play with them and they want to play with some of my toys. Children cry say no and began hugging each other rather than parents I would then start to realign the family roles by guiding children towards arenas for comfort rather than depending on each other when parents are available. I would do this by having rest at childrens level asking them for leave to comfort them. As mother becomes anxious and emotional and father instructs children to leave mommy alone upon them trying to comfort her, I would intervene by saying to children, â€Å"k well mommy and daddy need some time while you some(prenominal) decide on a back to play with them but then pop music would love for you both to help comfort your mommy. This will model time and enjoy given to the hierarchy of the family that be ing mom and dad yet allow children time for individual mime for choice and space. This would also allow parents to see the importance of circumstance proper structure, roles, and respectful boundaries in place. My apprehend would be to have the family engage in its normal family conflicts. I would do this by either playing a game relating to the last conflict such as the children not wanting to go to recede or take a bath.My session would go something like this. â€Å"Children play a game of wants, dodos and dont, I would ask each individual to tell me what you want to today, what you will do today and what you dont you want to do today? This would e done for each family member (with specific instructions in the beginning that whatever dont want to be done everyone must laugh at the end for them, then try doing those dont by adding something fun. In this case you dont want to take a bath but how force out you make it fun? The past tantrums could be realigned by making boundarie s fun thereby inventing new boundaries and replacing them with parental time with children that will help airframe the family structure. The past rules in the David family consisted of the grandparents filling in the place of parents, the parents diddlysquat to consider the importance of time spent with their children gave up their parental power as that secure base and trusting relationship with their children.My hope is that the engagements of family time spent together would build each individuals self-esteem and self-confidence as time and energy is being reciprocated here. References Goldenberg, 1. , Goldenberg, H. (2000). Family Therapy An Overview. ; . United States. Headwords, a division of doubting Thomas Learning. Figure provides Figure 1 . Caption of figure [Figures †note that this scallywag does not have the manuscript header and page number]\r\n'